![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
icecheetahJust some interesting observations and details.
You can use the image recovering steps here to place the header of one kind of file on another. You get some very interesting effects when you, for example. shove the data of a .tiff onto a file that has a .bmp header and nothing else. Heck, shove in more! As long as there's only one header (and footer? if that exists) then you should get something interesting.
Now look at the following image:
I saved this as a .TIFF and a .BMP to compare how the two formats appear in audacity.
Things to note:
That noise in the left of the .BMP and the right of the .TIFF is the data for the red line. From this, it appears the left side of the .BMP, where we go to get the header, actually correlates with the BOTTOM of the image. In the .TIFF on the other hand the lower parts of the image appear to the RIGHT. This may be, however, more to do with my image editor than the nature of the files. On my previous PC, the REVERSE was true.
Also, in both silence is white, but the appearance of the black area is quite different between them. This is one of the reasons that I like having versions of the image with black and white blackgrounds: white can almost act like transparancy, and black can interact in odd ways.
Finally, in Audacity you can adjust the volume of the tracks to change they way they "mix", like layer opacity in most image editors. Just don't change the volume of the track with the header(and footer if applicable). Maybe even separate those into their own track.
And with that, thank you for following, and make cool art!
Previous:Repairing Broken Images
You can use the image recovering steps here to place the header of one kind of file on another. You get some very interesting effects when you, for example. shove the data of a .tiff onto a file that has a .bmp header and nothing else. Heck, shove in more! As long as there's only one header (and footer? if that exists) then you should get something interesting.
Now look at the following image:
I saved this as a .TIFF and a .BMP to compare how the two formats appear in audacity.
Things to note:
That noise in the left of the .BMP and the right of the .TIFF is the data for the red line. From this, it appears the left side of the .BMP, where we go to get the header, actually correlates with the BOTTOM of the image. In the .TIFF on the other hand the lower parts of the image appear to the RIGHT. This may be, however, more to do with my image editor than the nature of the files. On my previous PC, the REVERSE was true.
Also, in both silence is white, but the appearance of the black area is quite different between them. This is one of the reasons that I like having versions of the image with black and white blackgrounds: white can almost act like transparancy, and black can interact in odd ways.
Finally, in Audacity you can adjust the volume of the tracks to change they way they "mix", like layer opacity in most image editors. Just don't change the volume of the track with the header(and footer if applicable). Maybe even separate those into their own track.
And with that, thank you for following, and make cool art!
Previous:Repairing Broken Images
